MUSICAL FUTURES PROGRAM
Who should be involved?
Administrators, Teachers, Students, Parents, School Community
|
How might they be engaged?
All stakeholders will have a participatory role with the
evaluation to enhance future applications and implementation of the program.
|
Focus the Evaluation
What are you going to evaluate? Describe program (logic model).
This program evaluation will focus on the Musical Futures Program.
This pedagogical model of music education is being used to expand
and implement music programs in schools within the Prairie Spirit School
Division. The hope from the school division is that this framework/model
will expand student engagement in meaningful music participation and
provide a structure which is more cost effective than more traditional
instrumental instruction which currently exists.
|
What is the purpose of the evaluation?
The intent of the evaluation is to assess whether or not the program delivers
what it claims and if it is actually providing authentic quality of music education
for students. Will the goals of the school division be met by using this program model?
|
Who will use the evaluation? How will they use it?
Who/users
|
How will they use the information?
|
School Division
|
They will be able to assess the effectiveness of the program by the ratio of student involvement and cost inputs, staff feedback, community feedback, positive results related to student engagement in music (academic/social)
|
Administrators/School Community
|
They will be able to assess the effectiveness of the program by the ratio of student involvement and cost inputs, staff feedback, community feedback, positive results related to student engagement in music (academic/social)
|
Students
Parents
|
Students – will be able to have evidence to advocate for their interests or needs educationally
Parents – will be able to make recommendations for future needs of students and families
|
What questions will the evaluation seek to answer?
Why has this program been selected as the model for music curriculum implementation?
|
Is this program providing an authentic music curriculum which allows for real life application of music skills?
|
Has the program increased student enrollment in music instruction?
|
Is this a successful model for supporting non-musically trained teachers to implement music instruction?
|
What information do you need to answer the questions?
What I wish to know
|
Indicators – How will I know it?
|
What is the program philosophy?
|
Referencing the program philosophy and identifying how the school division has implemented it.
|
What makes this a curriculum versus activity?
Is the program assessed for successful long term outcomes?
|
Examination of the program curriculum goals and long term growth/potential.
|
Does this program meet the music needs of stakeholders?
|
Examination of the feedback from stakeholders – positive, negative, suggestions for future applications.
|
Has the program increased student music engagement?
|
Identification of student enrollment numbers and life span of program in schools, is there an identifiable change in value of music in schools?
|
When is the evaluation needed?
Since this is a potential NEW program being implemented in the Fall of 2013, it would be helpful to initial assessments now and follow it throughout the implementation during the 2013-14 school year.
|
What evaluation design will you use?
Scriven - Summative and Formative
|
Collect the information
What sources of information will you use?
Existing information:
|
Previous program evaluations
|
People:
|
School Administrators, Teachers, Students, Parents, School Community
|
Pictorial records and observations:
|
Music activities, lessons, events, school climate observations related to music program
|
What data collection method(s) will you use?
x
|
Survey
|
Document review
| |
x
|
Interview
|
Testimonials
| |
x
|
Observation
|
Expert panel
| |
Group techniques
|
Simulated problems or situations
| ||
Case study
|
Journal, log, diary
| ||
Tests
|
Unobtrusive measures
| ||
x
|
Photos, videos
|
Other (list)
|
Instrumentation: What is needed to record the information?
Individual Stakeholder Surveys, Interview Questionnaires, Observation Survey,
|
When will you collect data for each method you’ve chosen?
Method
|
Before program
|
During program
|
Immediately after
|
Later
|
Survey
|
x
|
x
| ||
Observation
|
x
|
x
|
x
| |
Interview
|
x
|
x
|
x
|
Will a sample be used?
No
|
x
| |
Yes
|
If yes, describe the procedure you will use.
| |
How will the data be analyzed?
Data analysis methods:
|
Quantitative and Qualitative date will be tabulated and sorted
|
Who responsible:
|
As the program evaluator I will be directly involved with this process
|
How will the information be interpreted—by whom?
It would be beneficial to bring the information back to the schools/division to hold a focus group to determine how
|
the information will be used for future application of the program.
|
What did you learn? What are the limitations?
The ultimate goal is to learn whether or not this type of pedagogical approach to music instruction is meeting the
|
needs/interests of students and whether or not it diminishes the value/undermines a traditional instrumental music
|
program. Limitations to the program evaluation is that it demands long term observation of sustainability of the
|
Program.
|
How will the evaluation be communicated and shared?
To whom
|
When/where/how to present
|
All stakeholders
|
Focus group meeting, planning meeting
|
Next steps?
Does the success or failure of this program affect current music programs already in place which are more traditional in structure and philosophy?
|
Manage the evaluation Standards
x
|
Human subject’s protection
|
x
|
Utility
|
Management chart
|
x
|
Feasibility
| |
x
|
Timeline
|
Propriety
| |
x
|
Responsibilities
|
Accuracy
| |
Budget
|
Very good choice for your assessment plan. I think being able to look at a program as it is being introduced is a great way to judge its effectiveness. You address the required aspects well just make sure you attend to managing the evaluation in your final project. This section is important to assure the stakeholders that you are looking after the whole picture and to protect those who participated on behalf of the program. Do you think that classroom teachers might also benefit from your findings? I agree with the limitation you mention and I hope that the evaluation can take place repeatedly or over an extended period of time.
ReplyDeleteJay